
Each Council/Shire engages a Licensed Valuer for the purpose of valuing each property in their municipality in respect of:
If you conduct any building activity including obtaining certain permits, the council/shire can issue an Amended Rates Notice at any time.
The Council/Shire will declare a range of rates during their annual budgeting process that will then been multiplied usually by the CIV to determine the annual council/shire rates payable by the land owner.
The rates will vary depending upon the use and the relevant planning scheme that applies to the land. For instance there will generally be different rates per dollar for:
You usually have 60 days to object to a Council/Shire Rates Notice from the issue date, with most objections being:
The Council/Shire then provides the following two values to the SRO:
The 2025 Land Tax Assessments take into account land held at midnight on 31 December 2024 and use the value as prepared by councils in 2024.
You also have 60 days to object to a Land Tax Assessment from the issue date.
In addition, as Land Tax is a self-assessment system you need to consider whether:
It is often easier to object against the Council Rates Notice as in essence this information is then fed through to the SRO.
Where the valuation is not appropriate, it is prudent to obtain supporting evidence which in many cases will include a formal Valuation from a Property Valuer to support a lower and correct valuation.
There is a cost/benefit assessment to be done when lodging an objection.
To assist you we can:
The legislation has passed both houses of parliament and will apply to eligible BTR developments to:
The higher 30% MIT WHT rate was a major impediment to foreign investment in the BTR sector. This legislation should help boost foreign investment in the BTR sector with the PCA announcing that it could deliver 80,000 new homes over the next 10 years.
The key points from the recent amendments to the Bill that have been incorporated into the final legislation are:
The key features of the BTR MIT legislation are:
Dwelling features
For our original release on the BTR legislation and more details on the various State BTR regimes please click here.
We are specialists in property funds and property development and can provide valuable advice on your projects.
The State Taxation Further Amendment Bill 2024 (the Bill) received Royal Assent on 3 December 2024.
The key changes proposed by the Bill include:
Other amendments to payroll tax and other minor exemptions have also been proposed. We have unpacked these major state taxation changes below.
The CIPT scheme was introduced to replace stamp duty for future transactions involving commercial and industrial properties that have entered and continue to qualify under the scheme (referred to as CIPT Land). For further details take a look at our webinar or article on CIPT.
Under the newly introduced framework, stamp duty is intended to be levied one last time when a property enters the CIPT scheme through an initial qualifying transaction (‘entry transaction’).
Despite inclusion into the CIPT scheme, certain subsequent transactions (‘non standard transactions’) involving dutiable leases, fixtures and economic entitlements remain subject to duty.
The Bill introduces changes to provide upfront exemptions and concessions for ‘non-standard transactions’ which are defined as transactions such as the grant, transfer, or surrender of dutiable leases, or the acquisition of fixtures or economic entitlements related to CIPT Land.
These ‘non-standard transactions’ will be exempt from duty if one of the following applies:
The above upfront exemption is aimed at circumstances where appropriate duty has previously been paid as part of the land entering the CIPT.
Where full duty has not been paid, the Commissioner may exercise discretion to waive or reduce the duty payable on these transactions. The Commissioner considers:
Under the Duties Act 2000 (Vic), FPAD applies extra taxes on the acquisition of residential land by foreign purchasers in Victoria. Similarly, under the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic), the AOS imposes additional taxes on foreign owners holding land in Victoria.
The amendments are intended to address the risk that the existing provisions were invalid by reason of an inconsistency with theInternational Tax Agreements Act 1953 (Cth), which gives force to certain non-discrimination clauses in international tax treaties.
The Commonwealth Act was amended to explicitly state that state taxation laws override these international tax agreements in cases where these is an inconsistency. Despite this clarification, there remains a risk that courts could find the historical application of the FPAD and AOS invalid if they are deemed inconsistent with the Commonwealth law as it was at the time the alleged tax liabilities were incurred.
The new proposed provisions outline that if an FPAD or AOS liability is found to be invalid because of an inconsistency, a new replacement tax will be imposed which will mirror the original liability.
The proposed amendments will have the following practical effect, notwithstanding that the amendments will not apply if the liabilities are determined to be valid:
These proposed amendments ensure that the Victorian taxes are imposed as they were intended.
The proposed changes under the Bill create a new exemption under section 78D of the Land Tax Act 2005 (Vic) (Housing provided for the relief of poverty) which applies to land owned, managed, or controlled by a charitable institution that is occupied, or available for occupation, by residents solely in connection with the institution’s charitable purpose of relieving poverty.
The new exemption is also available to vacant land owned by a charitable institution and declared to be held for such future use and occupation. However, the caveat to this is that the Commissioner must be satisfied that the land will be exempt land within 2 years, or a period longer as approved by the Commissioner.
As is the case with other land tax exemptions, the exemption may apply on a partial basis if the Commissioner is satisfied that only a part of land is land that meets the exemption requirements. Land tax will remain assessable on the part of the land that is not exempt.
Contact one of our state taxes experts to discuss how the proposed amendments may impact you.
The OMB Guidance for Financial Assistance (Uniform Guidance) issued to all Federal agencies for use across all United States Federal Grants is the first major revision since its establishment in 2013.
The OMB originally established the requirements for federal grants management in 2013 consolidating and superseding requirements from several guidance documents related to the Federal financial assistance management and implementation of the Single Audit Act.
The four objectives for the current revisions, effective 1 October 2024 are:
Organisations should review the revised Uniform Guidance changes and determine if there are any impacts on their current federal awards. Changes that may impact organisations include the following:
Our approach to Uniform Guidance audits offers best practice expertise in a practical and commercial manner that is delivered using senior personnel with significant educational sector experience.
We have worked with 35 of the 41 major Australian universities and have extensive experience in assisting education providers with an appropriate audit of US Government sourced funds as required by the OMB Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance.
Our experts can assist with:
The AML/CTF Amendment Bill aims to effectively deter, detect and disrupt money laundering and terrorism financing and strengthen the existing frameworks to better address these evolving threats.
The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) notes the reforms modernise the regime to reflect changing business structures, technology and illicit financing methodologies. The amendments aim to bring Australia in line with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
AML/CTF compliance has been expanded to include:
If you are an entity already covered by AML/CTF requirements you will need to review and update your program and related processes and procedures.
Entities who now are regulated under AML/CTF must ensure they are:
Entities under the expansion will need to enrol with AUSTRAC by 31 March 2026 and be compliant with AML/CTF obligations by 1 July 2026. Reforms to tipping-off offence will commence on 31 March 2025.
AUSTRAC can take enforcement action for non-compliance with AML/CTF legislation including civil penalty orders, enforceable undertakings, infringement notices and remedial directions.
We are committed to working with clients to ensure they are prepared for and understand the new requirements.
Get in touch and our team can help with:
The returns will be used to assess the confidence level of a taxpayer’s compliance with GST law, and their investments placed into GST governance.
The Supplementary annual GST return will first apply to the 2024-25 financial year for those Top 100 and Top 1,000 taxpayers who received a GST assurance rating on or before 30 June 2024. The ATO will notify taxpayers if they are required to complete the return and provide the submission deadline. In the meantime, the ATO has published the form and detailed instructions so taxpayers can begin their preparation.
The return contains several questions for impacted taxpayers and their advisors, including:
Taxpayers who received one of the following on or prior to 30 June 2024 must lodge the annual return:
Taxpayers who received a GST assurance report on or prior to 30 June 2024 must lodge the return annually from the 2024-25 financial year. The following table sets out the relevant due dates:
Reach out to our GST experts for help reviewing your GST governance and ensure your annual GST return is completed accurately.
Taxpayers should also review their progress on implementing action items from their last ATO assurance review as part of the process of completing the return. By executing action items, this will reinforces the ATO’s confidence in their compliance and reduces the risk of future challenges for your business.
AASB 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements has been introduced to enhance the presentation of financial statement as well as for transparency and comparability in reporting a company’s operating results.
This new standard will significantly impact financial reporting for listed companies and other Tier 1 reporters. However, AASB 18 also provides management an opportunity to more closely align how they measure, and view performance compared to how is presented on the face of the statement of profit or loss.
Users of financial statements, especially investors, have raised concerns about the usefulness and comparability of information from financial statements.
Some common issues impacting the quality of information in financial reporting include:
There are three major changes under the new requirements:
The standard mandates that the profit or loss statement be structured into three categories:
It also introduces two new required subtotals:
AASB18 clarifies the definitions of the operating category and operating profit, ensuring consistency in how the company’s results are presented. There are new requirements for categorising and disclosing expenses, allowing for a more flexible presentation compared to the current binary classification based on function and nature.
Many companies, especially listed entities, choose to report alternative performance measures, also referred to as “non-IFRS”, such as adjusted earnings, EBITDA, or adjusted EBITDA. Some of those measures will become Management-defined Performance Measures (MPMs) and will be subject to the new standard’s disclosure requirements.
If a company reports MPMs in other areas of reporting, such as the directors’ report, it must bring that information into the notes of the financial statements and reconcile it back to the nearest subtotal in the profit or loss statement. The tax and non-controlling interest (NCI) impacts of those reconciliation items must also be disclosed.
Management must explain in the notes the reasons for selecting the MPMs and any changes to these measures. All the MPMs and related disclosures will be subject to audit as they form part of the notes.
There are enhanced requirements regarding the grouping of information and the disclosure of items labelled “other”. Further guidance is now available on how and when to aggregate or disaggregate information.
Although AASB 18 primarily impacts the profit or loss statement, the new aggregate and disaggregated requirements may also impact on other areas of the financial statements.
Companies are also now required to present interest and dividends received under ‘investing cash flows’, while payments must be recorded under financing. Previous accounting policy choices regarding such presentations have been removed.
The adoption of the new standards is expected to have a major impact across all Tier 1 financial reports. Management will need to consider whether any of its contracts and remuneration, often linked to profit or loss, will be affected. Loan covenants linked to profit or loss may also need to be clarified.
Depending on existing systems and reporting processes, the financial reporting impact ranges from remapping the chart of accounts to requiring changes in systems and processes. For example, properly categorising foreign exchange transactions could be complex.
Companies will need to train internal staff involved in financial reporting and communicate changes to various internal and external stakeholders, as these changes may also impact on budgeting and forecasting tools and reports.
The new standard will be mandatory for the first time on 1 January 2027. For entities with a December year-end, this means it will apply to the year ending 31 December 2027. Comparative information will also be required.
Many listed companies report interim financial reports; AASB 18 will be applicable for any interim reporting starting 1 January 2027.
Early adoption of the new requirement is permitted by the standard.
For Tier 1 not-for-profit entities, the mandatory effective date is 1 January 2028, which is one year later compared to their for-profit counterparts.
At this stage, AASB 18 does not apply to those preparing financial reports under the Simplified Disclosures Standard, commonly known as “Tier 2”. AASB is currently working on strategies for Tier 2 entities.
Our team of audit and assurance experts are fully informed of the requirements of the new accounting standard and can assist with providing guidance for your business, as well as keeping you abreast of developments from an Australian reporting context.
We can:
Reach out to your SW contacts or the key contacts here for a conversation.
To enhance the transparency and accountability of climate-related matters, on 9 September 2024, the Australian Parliament passed Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Market Infrastructure and Other Measures) Bill 2024.
This highly anticipated bill mandates that large entities adhere to the new sustainability reporting standards issued by the AASB, which align with international standards. The first group of entities will be required to submit their sustainability reports from annual reporting periods beginning 1 January 2025, with smaller entities being phased in over the following years.
A new sustainability reporting requirement has been introduced for disclosing information on climate-related matters. When applicable, the sustainability report must be prepared alongside the annual report. This report will adhere to sustainability reporting standards issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board, which are closely aligned with international standards.
This alignment will ensure much-needed comparability across companies. The Australian equivalent standards propose making climate reporting mandatory, while other sustainability topics, such as biodiversity and human capital, remain optional.
Additionally, the final bill mandates further scenario analysis based on feedback from Parliament. Entities must disclose scenario analysis using at least both of the following scenarios:
The government proposes a phased approach based on the size of the entities. The table below sets out the details of the threshold and date for the implementation.
The above Table is summarised from Explanatory memorandum of the bill
Group 3 entities are required to make climate disclosure if they have material risks or opportunities.
Following the consultation feedback, the AASB has decided to revise the titles and numbering of the sustainability standards to align with IFRS S1 and S2. The new titles will be AASB S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information and AASB S2 Climate-related Disclosures. AASB S1, which covers broader sustainability topics, will be a voluntary standard, while AASB S2, focusing on climate, will be mandatory. The standards are expected to be issued in the coming weeks.
The disclosures will need to follow the stainability standards issued by the AASB. The key areas of disclosure include:
In addition to a qualitative description of the risks and opportunities, the company is also required to disclose quantitative scenario analysis. There are several reliefs proposed by the government in relation to more complex disclosure of Scope 3 emission and quantitative analysis.
The above disclosure will need to be included in a new annual sustainability report. The structure and content of the sustainability report consists:
The annual sustainability report will be presented together with the financial report.
The company’s financial auditor will audit the sustainability report. The auditing standards setter, AuASB, is currently consulting with stakeholders to determine the required level of assurance for climate-related disclosures.
Based on the most recent exposure draft, we understand the proposed audit requirement will also be phased in. We expect that in the first year of reporting, different content will be subject to different assurance requirements as below:
We can conduct gap analysis and prepare a road map to guide you on your journey.
Our team of audit and advisory experts are fully informed of the requirements of the sustainability accounting standards and can assist with providing guidance for your business, as well as keeping you abreast of developments from an Australian reporting context.
Keep an eye out for further alerts from us in respect of the finalisation of the sustainability standards by the AASB which is expected in the next few weeks, the sustainability reporting assurance standard under development by the AuASB and any announcements from ASIC on this new area.
To counteract the increased cost of living pressures, the NSW government has introduced an exemption and rebate on payroll tax liabilities for payments to contractor general practitioners (GPs) by medical practices meeting the relevant bulk-billing threshold. The relevant bulk-billing thresholds for Sydney and the rest of NSW is 80% and 70% respectively.
In addition, historical unpaid payroll tax liabilities for pre-4 September 2024 payments made to contractor GPs will be exempt from payroll tax. After the 4th of September 2024, medical practices meeting the bulk-billing threshold requirements will be eligible to receive a complete rebate for payroll tax associated with the payments made to contractor GPs.
The aim of this measure is to support accessibility and affordability of health-care by incentivising medical practices to increase bulk-billing to gain eligibility to the rebate. It was projected that this measure is expected to reduce payroll tax revenue for NSW by roughly $180.8 million over the next four years, though the actual impact is likely to be less as medical practices restructure affairs such that the payroll tax obligation does not arise in the first instance.
Medical practices operating in NSW should carefully consider the above changes and how they might take advantage of the upcoming relief initiative. For instance, GP clinics may like to consider the structure of their arrangements with GPs where they meet the threshold requirements, particularly where GPs are engaged as employees.
Some important things to consider are whether the practice is eligible under the bulk-billing threshold requirement as well as reviewing contracts with GPs and the overall billing practices to ensure everything all information is accurately taken into consideration.
For those practices where the measures do not apply, it is worth considering whether and how contractor arrangements may be restructured to reduce adverse payroll tax implications. In addition, it may be worth considering which payments at or around the cut off time may be eligible for the exemption.
Says Chair of SW, Mr Stephen O’Flynn, “As the leader of the Property & Infrastructure Group and the Business Development Tax Partner, Matt has demonstrated exceptional leadership and expertise. He is also well-known for hosting our Federal Budget webinars, providing insightful analysis and guidance.
Matt’s strong focus on commercial and advisory support for his clients reflects his strategic capabilities, which will be a tremendous asset to our Board. His experience and insights will be crucial as we navigate our key priorities and continue to drive the firm’s success. We look forward to the valuable contributions Matt will make in his new role.”
Matt fills the vacancy created by Partner Hayley Underwood, who steps down from the Executive Board after 3 years’ service to take on leading the Assurance & Advisory division.
“I would like to thank Hayley for the important contribution that she has made to the Executive Board during a period of significant growth of the firm. She has demonstrated exceptional leadership on our Quality and Risk Committee that has ensured that we have built on some great foundations to elevate a whole of firm approach to this important area. I wish her all the best in her knew role as the Divisional Head of Assurance and Advisory” said Mr O’Flynn.
Mr Matt Birrell stated: “I’m truly honoured to be voted onto the board by my Partner colleagues and I’m genuinely excited to take an active role in upholding our firm’s governance and strategy. We have an outstanding commitment to quality and risk management, and I’m looking forward to working with my fellow board members to continue driving our success in these areas as we grow.”
Hayley reflects on her time on the SW Board: “Reflecting on my service, I am proud of the progress we’ve made together on our strategic priorities, particularly the investment we have made in our system of quality management. Our continued commitment to quality has been crucial in supporting our growth.”
Over the next four years, SW will strategically focus on Growth, People, and Digital, with leadership, governance, and culture serving as the foundational pillars for our success. Ranked 22nd in the 2024 Australian Financial Review Top 100 Accounting Firms*, SW remains an attractive choice for clients and practitioners seeking a firm with a solid financial foundation and a forward-looking vision.
Matt Birrell will work closely with board member Greg Will, Duane Rogers as CEO, Bessie Zhang, Stephen O’Flynn (Chair) and independent director, Sangeeta Venkatesan.
SW congratulates Matt on his appointment and thanks Hayley for her significant contribution during her tenure.
*Of all national accounting practices, SW ranks 9th
Supporting the firm’s brand awareness campaign: Australia’s best kept accounting secret