The Wage Theft Bill 2020 creates new employee entitlement offences, comprising wage theft offences and new record keeping offences. It is designed to capture employers who falsify or fail to keep records for the purposes of concealing wage theft.
The key objective of the Bill is to ensure that employers who withhold employee entitlements dishonestly are held to account and protect vulnerable employees from exploitation.
The new law states that employers who dishonestly withhold wages, superannuation or other employee entitlements could be fined up to $198,264 for individuals, $991,320 for companies and be sentenced to up to 10 years’ jail.
Directors of companies / Council members have a legal responsibility to ensure the company meets its Pay As You Go (PAYG) withholding and Superannuation Guarantee Charge (SGC) obligations. If the company does not meet these obligations, Directors / Council members may become personally liable for a penalty equal to these amounts.
In light of these new laws and given the number of organisations that have been publicly identified to have underpaid employees we urge all businesses to undertake a payroll health check. The health check will ensure that all entitlements, including superannuation, are accurately determined and paid in compliance with the current ATO requirements to avoid any penalties.
Employers are required to review and reassess their contracts for all casual employees.
Following the landmark decision handed down by the High Court of Australia in the Workpac Pty Ltd v Rossato case and statutory changes to the Fair Work Act 2009 (FWA) in March 2021 with retrospective effect, employers are required to review and reassess their casual labour contracts. Particularly where there is regular and systematic work provided and the employee’s contract has a commitment to future work.
Leave entitlements can be a minefield for employers, especially when relating to casual employees. To help you understand the potential risks and obligations, please read our alert and FAQs.
Through the use of sophisticated data analytics and a review of your current awards, enterprise agreements and payroll processes, SW can assist you to manage your organisation’s payroll and superannuation risks efficiently, as well as identifying potential savings opportunities.
We use our customised data analytics tool to review your payroll records to identify any shortfalls or disclosure concerns.
Rest assured that whilst the Government’s social distancing guidelines are in force, we are able to assist you remotely during this period and are able to provide the full benefits of these services.
Reach out to one of our SW experts below to discuss how we can support you.
In September 2020, draft ruling DA-064 on the meaning of the term ‘land development’ was released for consultation.
The Victorian Commissioner’s view under the draft ruling was quite controversial. It was widely believed by industry that the view expressed in the draft ruling, regarding what was considered to be land development went beyond what was contemplated or intended to be captured by the law.
After consideration of submissions from various stakeholders, amendments were made to the draft ruling and a more balanced final ruling has now been released.
The ruling and the definition of ‘land development’ in a duty context is of particular relevance to:
Foreign purchasers
Foreign purchasers may be liable for additional duty if they acquire:
This additional duty impost is commonly referred to as Foreign Purchaser Additional Duty (FPAD). The FPAD rate is 8% over and above the normal duty rate.
Relevantly, the definition of residential property includes land on which a person has undertaken or intends to undertake land development to create residential property.
Nomination arrangements
The definition of land development also has relevance to arrangements involving nominations of land contracts pre-settlement. Where there has been an acquisition of a transfer right between contract/option date and settlement of a transfer, the performance of land development can trigger double duty under the ‘sub-sale’ duty rules. A common scenario that attracts a liability under the sub-sale provisions is where ‘land development’ occurred between the contract date and the nomination date.
The term ‘land development’ is defined in section 3(1) of the Victorian Duties Act 2000. It has six alternative limbs, the satisfaction of any one of which would mean that a land development activity is involved.
These limbs are:
(a) preparing a plan of subdivision of the land or taking any steps to have a plan registered under the Subdivision Act 1988
(b) applying for or obtaining a permit under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 in relation to the use or development of the land
(c) requesting under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 a planning authority to prepare an amendment to a planning scheme that would affect the land
(d) applying for or obtaining a permit or approval under the Building Act 1993 in relation to the land
(e) doing anything in relation to the land for which a permit or approval referred to in paragraph (d) would be required
(f) developing or changing the land in any other way that would lead to the enhancement of its value.
The purpose of the ruling is to clarify the SRO’s interpretation of each of these six limbs.
The final ruling indicates the Commissioner will generally consider the following matters in determining whether any of the above limbs are satisfied:
Generally, the Commissioner will only take into consideration activities undertaken directly or indirectly by a party to the contract/agreement and nomination, including activities by related parties, agents, and others who act with the knowledge or consent from any of the parties. This is a change from the draft Ruling.
It is important to note the final ruling provides that it is not necessary to demonstrate that there is an increase in value or change in utility of the land for land development to be considered to have occurred (other than development under limb (f)).
The change provides clarity that an appreciation of value is not necessarily required to be shown when contemplating if an activity carried out under limb (a) – (e) is considered land development. An activity that does not fall within the ambit of limb (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e), may still constitute land development under limb (f) if it enhances the value of the land.
In addition, the draft ruling previously outlined that it is irrelevant who carries out or intends to carry out the process of development. This wording has been removed from the final ruling which now states the Commissioner will only take into consideration activities undertaken directly or indirectly by a party to the contract/agreement and nomination, including activities by related parties, agents, associates or tenants who act with the knowledge or consent from any of the parties.
A number of factors are listed in the ruling as being evidence, in the Commissioner’s view, that one of the ‘land development limbs’ referred to above is satisfied. This list (which is not exhaustive) includes items that are relatively obvious, but also includes activities like:
Limb (a) includes ‘taking any steps to have a plan registered under the Subdivision Act 1988’. The final ruling states that this includes engaging professional surveyors or drafting a plan of subdivision. Therefore ‘land development’ can occur well before any formal steps to register a subdivision take place.
The Ruling states that ‘preliminary research’ and ‘informal surveys’ of a property will not amount to ‘land development’. Nevertheless, many areas of uncertainty remain.
In the draft ruling the following activities were considered land development:
This wording has now been removed from the final ruling, however it is unclear whether the Commissioner would still take into consideration such activities when determining whether land development has occurred.
For reference, a full list of the factors outlined in the ruling have been included in the table below.
Limb of Legislation | Activities that will constitute ‘land development’ under Final Ruling | Activities that will not constitute ‘land development’ under Final Ruling |
---|---|---|
(a) Preparing a plan of subdivision of the land or taking any steps to have a plan registered under the Subdivision Act 1988 | Under this limb, initial activities undertaken to prepare a plan of subdivision or measures towards registering a plan of subdivision or consolidation under the Subdivision Act 1988 constitute land development. These activities include:
| Activities that are not considered to be land development under limb (a) include: Preliminary research and analysis on the market and the area in order to identify the general development potential of the property, including:
|
(b) Applying for or obtaining a permit under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 in relation to the use or development of the land | There are two sub-limbs within limb (b):
The satisfaction of either of the sub-limbs amount to land development under limb (b). There are three types of applications that can be made in relation to permits under the Planning and Environment Act 1987:
An application for a permit, the granting of the permit or granting of the permit with conditions under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 constitute land development within the meaning of limb (b). A Permit to renovate or restore a derelict property would be considered as land development under limb (b). | In relation to amending an existing permit, generally, municipal councils require minor amendments to be made in a Secondary Consent Form. The Commissioner takes the view that such minor amendments do not constitute land development under limb (b).
Asking for an extension of time for an existing permit in itself may not be contemplated in limb (b). However, if the value of the land is enhanced as a result of the time extension, the granting of the time extension may constitute land development under limb (f). Generally, the commissioner will not regard a permit solely for maintenance work (for example, a permit for minor repairs on part of an existing fence) as amounting to land development. Note Example 2A which refers to a contract of sale that is subject to a planning permit being granted, where the contract price includes consideration for the permit. This is stated to be ‘land development’ but not subject to additional sub-sale duty. |
(c) Requesting under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 a planning authority to prepare an amendment to a planning scheme that would affect the land | A planning scheme which is issued by the Minister has more extensive coverage than a permit referred to in limb (b). A planning scheme may apply to a municipal district, a number of municipal districts and/or any other area(s) that are not in the same municipal district.
There is no formal process set out in the Planning and Environment Act 1987 on how a request is to be made to a planning authority to prepare an amendment to a planning scheme; it is also silent on who can make such a request. The commissioner takes the view that a request for the purpose of limb (c) would generally be in the form of a submission. The following are examples where a submission would constitute a request under limb (c):
| Submissions that do not advocate for amendments to be made to a planning scheme do not constitute land development under limb (c).
In particular, submissions that seek to preserve the status quo or informal discussions about the process for a planning scheme amendment would not be considered as a request under limb (c). Note that the final ruling is narrower than the draft ruling and it is now limited to amendments to the planning scheme made at the initiative or request of the parties to the contract or their agents. It is understood that amendments initiated by other bodies, such as a Council initiated Precinct Structure Plan (PCP) would not be considered ‘land development’. |
(d) Applying for or obtaining a permit or approval under the Building Act 1993 in relation to the land | There are two sub-limbs within limb (d):
If a building permit or approval is issued after the contract date, land development under limb (d) has occurred even if the application was made prior to the contract date. Under the Building Act 1993, a permit or approval is required to carry out building work except for exempt building work. Building work is defined broadly to mean work for or in connection with the construction, demolition or removal of a building. The application and approval processes for a building permit and an amendment to an existing permit are set out in the Building Act 1993. An application for and the granting of a building permit or approval under the Building Act 1993 constitute land development under limb (d). Amendments to building permits could also constitute land development under limb (f). | Nothing referred to in DA-064. |
(e) Doing anything in relation to the land for which a permit or approval referred to in paragraph (d) would be required | This limb captures activities undertaken on land which require a permit or approval under the Building Act 1993 and which are done with or without obtaining such permit or approval The Commissioner takes guidance from the Building Act 1993 and its subordinate instruments regarding the type of works that would constitute land development under this limb. | Nothing referred to in DA-064. |
(f) Developing or changing the land in any other way that would lead to the enhancement of its value | Limbs (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of the definition of land development encompass activities typically involved in developing land regardless of whether they lead to an enhancement of its value. Limb (f) Is focused on activities that enhance the value of the land. Even if an activity falls outside the ambit of the other limbs, it may nevertheless constitute land development under limb (f) if it leads to the enhancement of the value of land.
Activities that do not alter the physical characteristics of land may still amount to land development if they lead to an enhancement of the value of the land. These may include a removal of a covenant on title (e.g. removal of a single dwelling covenant) or a removal of land from the Victorian Heritage Register. A rezoning of land may also amount to land development under limb (f) where: 1.A Minister rezones land as a result of submissions from any of the parties to the contract (including their associates and persons under their instructions), or 2.Any parties to the contract (including their associates and persons under their instructions) made a submission in support of a proposed rezoning of land. If there is an activity that leads to an enhancement of the land value, it is irrelevant whether there are any other contemporaneous activities that may have a negative impact on the land. Where necessary, the Commissioner will rely on the opinion of the Valuer-General or another competent valuer to determine if there has been a change in the value of the land and whether that change resulted from the activity or market forces. | Nothing referred to in DA-064. |
If you believe that you may be effected by the final ruling, have any questions, or even believe that there are circumstances that would warrant a further submission to the SRO, please contact us – either your usual SW contact or any of our experts below.
Carmelin De Francesco
Robert Parker
The NSW Government has now made rent relief assistance available to help minimise the impact of lockdown on NSW businesses with lease agreements.
The relief comes following amendments to the Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Amendment Regulation 2021 (NSW) (‘the Regulation’) earlier this month.
The amendments were passed on 13 August 2021 and provide greater protections to impacted lessees by reinstating National Cabinet’s Commercial Leasing Code of Conduct. The Regulation seeks to ensure that the economic impact of COVID-19 is shared by both property owners and tenants.
Combined with the land tax concessions and the newly established Commercial Landlord Hardship Fund available to property owners, the Regulation seeks to limit the economic damage of COVID-19 and maximise the number of businesses able to resume normal operation when public health orders are lifted.
What do the Regulations provide for?
Under the Regulation, property owners must negotiate rent relief agreements with eligible impacted lessees in accordance with the leasing principles in the National Code of Conduct.
Under those principles, property owners are required to offer tenants rent relief proportionate to the tenant’s decline in turnover. Waivers should make up at least 50 per cent of any rent relief provided (unless the impacted lessee agrees otherwise). Rental deferrals make up the balance.
Eligibility
In order to be eligible an ‘impacted lessee’ must:
Decline in Turnover Test
The Regulation does not prescribe a specific period that parties should use to calculate decline in turnover. As such, parties are free to determine an appropriate period that works for them.
Impacted lessees should provide evidence of their decline in turnover to their property owner to help them calculate the appropriate rent reduction. Evidence could include a Business Activity Statement (BAS) or an Accountant’s Letter.
If an impacted lessee’s circumstances change, they can make a subsequent request to negotiate future rent adjustments.
For the purposes of calculating an appropriate rent reduction, payments from Government COVID-19 grants should be included as part of an impacted lessee’s turnover.
Process for agreeing rent relief
The period during which the rules apply is 13 July 2021 to 13 January 2022. Impacted lessees in financial distress and their property owners should start the process of negotiating rent relief agreements as soon as possible. Support measures will be reviewed regularly as required due to the changing environment brought about by the pandemic.
For the six-month period (July 2021 – January 2022), commercial and retail property owners cannot take certain actions against an impacted lessee (e.g. evict an impacted lessee, increase rent level) unless they have first renegotiated rent and attempted mediation.
If a lessee is asked to negotiate rent reduction, they must respond within 14 days of receiving the request, or another period if agreed by both parties.
Commercial property owners and impacted lessees must negotiate rent relief agreements by taking into consideration the following principles in National Cabinet’s Code of Conduct on commercial tenancies (unless otherwise agreed by both parties):
Requirements for both parties
Commercial property owners and impacted lessees should work together to negotiate a rent relief agreement. Where parties are unable to do this, they must attend mediation through the Small Business Commission.
Interim arrangements for urgent matters involving a threatened or actual eviction, can be sought through the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal or the courts.
For standard matters, the Small Business Commission aims to offer a date within five weeks of application.
For urgent matters, mediation can be arranged within days. The mediator cannot impose any outcome but, if a mediation is successful, parties can enter a binding deed.
Where mediation is unsuccessful, parties can pursue action through the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal or the NSW civil courts.
As a result of the Regulation a landlord may not:
unless the Small Business Commissioner has first certified that mediation has failed to resolve the dispute, whilst also enunciating the reasons for the mediation being unsuccessful.
It is important that impacted parties obtain advice from their legal advisers with respect to the matters noted above to ensure their obligations and rights are appropriately dealt with as provided by the Regulation.
Landlord’s assistance/relief
Where landlords have provided rent relief to ‘impacted lessees’, they are entitled to land tax relief of an equivalent amount of their land tax liability for 2021, with the relief limited to the actual land tax liability. The relief will be a rebate for those landlords who have already paid land tax and a waiver for those landlords that have not paid their land tax. Please refer to our previous update on land tax relief for further information.
The New South Wales government is also in the process of establishing a new $40 million Hardship Fund. This Fund will provide a monthly grant of up to $3,000 for qualifying landlords who provide a rent waiver of at least the same value of the Hardship Fund grant, as well as any land tax relief that the landlord is granted.
How SW can assist
Whether you are a commercial landlord or business tenant, our experts are highly experienced in assisting with calculations of decline in turnover, eligibility assessment, the application and negotiation process.
Reach out to one of our tax and property experts below for a conversation about your circumstances.
Get in touch
Tony Principe
Blake Rodgers
The scheme seeks to provide rent relief to commercial tenants affected by COVID-19 and operates in a similar manner to the Regulations released in March 2020, which expired on 28 March 2021. However, there are key differences including more specific details as to how to calculate the tenant’s decline in turnover and a mandatory reassessment process which will adjust the relief percentage from 31 October 2021.
Outlined below are the key eligibility requirements, the turnover reduction calculation methodology and the processes to be followed.
Decline in Turnover Test
Turnover means Current GST Turnover as defined in the GST Act, with some modifications in Regulation 11.
Decline of at least 15% for ACNC registered charities (with some exclusions); or 30% for all other entities.
Turnover test, periods to compare:
Process for agreeing rent relief
Rent relief period
The period commences on either:
The period ends 15 January 2022.
Mandatory Reassessment – before 31 October
For agreements reached on or before 30 September 2021, the tenant must provide the following by 31 October 2021 for re-assessment:
The net percentage change is then used for the purposes of calculating rent relief from 31 October 2021.
If the tenant fails to provide the necessary information by 31 October, the rent relief agreement no longer applies to the extent that it relates to any waiver of rent from the assessment date. That means only the deferred portion of any rent relief will continue after 31 October.
Subsequent relief
Tenants can apply for further relief if their financial circumstances materially change, following the process described above under “Process for agreeing rent relief” subheading.
Any new rent relief agreement will apply in substitution of the original agreement.
Extension of term
The landlord must offer an extension on the same terms as were in place on 28 July equivalent to the period for which rent is deferred. E.g. if 3 months rent is deferred, 3 months must be added to the term of the lease.
Deferred rent
The landlord cannot request payment until after 15 January 2022.
Deferred amount is to be paid over the greater of the remaining term of the lease, including any extension, and 24 months.
Previous deferrals
Any leases subject to rent deferrals under the previous (2020) rent relief scheme, must have the repayment of those deferrals paused and resumed after 15 January 2022.
Dispute resolution
Either party can refer a dispute to the Small Business Commissioner for mediation.
Further powers are provided to the Small Business Commissioner to make a binding order in certain circumstances.
Application can be made to VCAT for review of a binding order in certain circumstances.
Alternative comparison periods
Test | Comparison period |
---|---|
Began trading after 1 April 2019 | – If commenced trading between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2020, the sum of each whole month turnover before 1 April 2020, divided by the number of whole months, multiplied by 3 – If commenced trading between 1 April 2020 and 31 March 2021, the sum of each whole month turnover before 31 July 2021, divided by the number of whole months, multiplied by 3 – If commenced trading after 1 April 2021, the total turnover to 31 July 2021, divided by the number of days trading, multiplied by 92 |
Business acquisition or disposal affecting comparison turnover | Turnover for first full whole month after the acquisition or disposal multiplied by 3 |
Business restructure affecting comparison turnover | Turnover for first full whole month after the restructure multiplied by 3 |
Substantial increase in turnover by: – 50% or more in the 12 months before, or – 25% or more in the 6 months before, or – 12.5% or more in the 3 months before the (2021 COVID) turnover test period | Turnover for the 3 months immediately before the (2021 COVID) turnover test period |
Business affected by drought or natural disaster | Turnover for the same period in the year immediately before the declaration of drought or natural disaster |
Business has irregular turnover. Applies if business is not cyclical and in the 12 months before the turnover test period, the lowest consecutive 3 months turnover is no more than 50% of the highest consecutive 3 months turnover | Use the average monthly turnover in the 12 months before the turnover test period multiplied by 3 |
Sole trader or small partnership with sickness, injury or leave | Turnover from the month immediately before the month of illness multiplied by 3 |
Tenant temporarily ceased trading for 1 week or more during comparison period | – Turnover for 3 months immediately before the month in which the business ceased trading, or – Turnover for the same period but in the year before the business ceased trading |
How SW can assist
Our teams can assist commercial landlords and tenants to calculate the decline in turnover, assessing eligibility, the application and negotiation process.
Reach out to one of our experts below for a conversation about your circumstances.
Blake Rodgers
The NSW Government land tax relief is now available to commercial and residential landowners who provide a reduction in rent to tenants experiencing financial distress due to COVID-19.
Following a similar scheme provided in 2020, the current program provides a reduction in land tax payable for the 2021 land tax year for eligible landowners providing rent relief to tenants between 1 July 2021 and 31 December 2021. Applications will be open until 31 January 2022.
Residential landlords have the option of choosing between the land tax relief or the Residential Tenancy Support Payment of up to $1,500 per tenancy agreement if they agree to reduce rent for COVID-19 impacted tenants from 14 July 2021 to 31 December 2021. If the residential landlord has claimed the Residential Tenancy Support Payment they will be ineligible for land tax relief.
How is land tax relief calculated and provided?
Landlord eligibility requirements
Key evidence required
Our teams can assist both commercial and residential landlords of all sizes to review evidence documentation, financials, and provide accountant letters to ensure your application is successful. Reach out to one of our experts for a conversation about your circumstances.
Tony Principe
Blake Rodgers
Dilushi Wijesinghe
[1] Land tax attributable is the taxable value of the parcel of land divided by the aggregated taxable value of all parcels of land, multiplied by the landowner’s 2021 land tax liability.
Employers are required to review and reassess their contracts for casual employees before 27 September 2021.
Review required for casual labour contracts
It is a common misconception that casual employees are not entitled to any personal, annual and long service leave based on the premise that they receive a loading on hourly rates as compensation.
Following the landmark decision handed down by the High Court of Australia in the Workpac Pty Ltd v Rossato case and statutory changes to the Fair Work Act 2009 (FWA) in March 2021 with retrospective effect, employers are required to review and reassess their casual labour contracts. Particularly where there is regular and systematic work provided and the employee’s contract has a commitment to future work.
Leave entitlements can be a minefield for employers, especially when relating to casual employees. To help you understand the potential risks and obligations, we have set out below the current position for annual leave and long service leave.
When is a casual employee entitled to annual leave?
An employee’s entitlement to annual leave is prescribed in the National Employment Standards (NES) within the FWA. In general terms, a casual employee is not entitled to annual leave and generally other types of leave, i.e. personal leave etc. On 27 March 2021, the FWA was amended to include the definition of casual employment. The amendments have retrospective effect and provide a 6 month transition period.
A casual employee is defined as someone who has accepted a job offer from an employer knowing that there is no firm advance commitment to ongoing work with an agreed pattern of work.
A casual employee will be classified as permanent where there is a ‘casual conversion’. This will apply where the employee has completed 12 months of service. There is an exemption for small business where they employee less than 15 employees at a particular time.
Who is entitled to long service leave?
Long service leave in Australia is covered under Australian State legislation. In most instances, an employee will be covered by the Long Service Leave Act (LSL) in the applicable State where they work, although various industry sectors have separate Acts, e.g. construction and cleaning industries.
All State LSL Acts provide that full time, part time, casual, seasonal and fixed term employees are entitled to long service leave. The entitlement is subject to an important provision that their employment is ‘continuous’, i.e. no breaks in service. The contentious issue for casual employees is whether their services meets the definition of continuous employment. This definition varies between the LSL Acts although all contain the same principles with differing periods of time.
Continuous means there must not be an absence of more than 12 weeks (except for NSW, SA, WA and NT limited to 2 months) between any two instances of employment, unless:
The key issue for employers to address is whether their current contractual arrangements with their casual staff provide for regular, certain, continuing, constant and predictable work.
By comparison, casual employment that would not be continuous is one where the work allocated to the employee is unpredictable, irregular, intermittent and not pre-allocated.
What should employers do?
Record keeping
Employers must keep accurate records during the entire period of employment, retain these for at least seven years after the employment ceases and must be kept in the form prescribed by the regulations made under the applicable LSL Acts.
An employer must not refuse a request from an employee to provide their Long Service Leave record and criminal penalties may apply.
Calculation of entitlement
Casual and seasonal employees accrue long service leave in the same way as part-time and full-time employees.
An employee is entitled to be paid their long service leave based on their ‘ordinary pay’, ie: actual pay received for working his or her normal weekly hours and ordinary time rate of pay at the time the leave is taken or is to be paid out on termination.
The long service leave entitlement for casuals who do not have normal weekly hours, is calculated by averaging the hours of work.
If the casual does not have an ‘ordinary rate’, perhaps due to piece work rates, then averaging requirements will also apply. The calculation of rates vary between the States. For example, in Victoria the rate will be the greatest of the average earned over either the last 52 weeks, 260 weeks or entire period of employment.
What action is required before 27 September 2021? Employers (except small business) are required to review their current contractual arrangements with casual employees and:
How can SW assist?
|
Get in touch
Reach out to one of our payroll experts below for guidance on how you can navigate these changes.
Contacts
Janelle McPhee
SW summarises the key changes to investor visas and notes important advice from ASIC regarding who is legally allowed to provide financial investment advice in Australia.
Recognising that the growth of the Business Innovation and Investment Program (BIIP) is continuing to support Australia’s post-COVID-19 recovery through the investments and other economic contributions of visa applicants, the Federal Government has exempted all visas in the BIIP class with regard to travel restrictions to Australia. Additionally, late in 2020 the Department of Home Affairs announced that it would fast track Significant Investor Visa (SIV) and Investor Visa (IV) applications.
In 2020, a review of the BIIP program visa classes saw a reduction in the number of visa streams from nine to four, which included the cancellation of the Premium Investor, Significant Business History and Venture Capital Entrepreneur visas. It is expected that these changes will lead to an increased interest in the refurbished 188 SIV and IVs.
Overall, the changes are seen as being positive, with the attractive features and flexibility of BIIP continuing to prove popular to applicants.
What has changed for SIV and IV classes?
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs, Alex Hawke, announced in May that the “Increased investment thresholds and the adjustment of investment ratios to focus more on venture capital and private growth equity will better support innovation and emerging enterprises in Australia”.
From 1 July 2021 the following CIF ratios will apply to both the Investor and the Significant Investor Visa streams:
A summary of these changes implemented from 1 July 2021 can be accessed here.
How we can help
For SIV and IV applications made between 1 July 2015 and 1 July 2021, the old rules will remain in place and the SW advisory team continues to provide advice and assist applicants and visa holders to manage and implement SIV and IV portfolios.
If you are considering applying under the post 1 July 2021 rules, our team can provide complete advice and assistance for:
Important note regarding Significant Investor Visa – Advice from ASIC
It has been found that some SIV applicants have been victims of serious financial fraud in Australia. Australia’s corporate regulator ASIC (the Australian Securities and Investments Commission) has expressed growing concern to the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) about investment referrals to particular managed fund products when visa applicants are being provided with immigration assistance.
Where a registered migration agent (RMA) or Australian legal practitioner refers a SIV applicant to a managed fund product, the referral might involve the RMA or Australian legal practitioner providing financial product advice under the Act.
With a message originating from the Immigration Integrity and Assurance Branch of the Department of Home Affairs, the Office of Migration Agents Registration Authority (OMARA) emailed all RMAs on 23 July to reiterate who can, and cannot, provide financial advice to Managed Fund Products under Australian law.
It stipulates that a person cannot provide financial advice in Australia unless the person holds an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL).
ASIC recommends that you encourage SIV applicants to seek independent financial advice and, as far as possible, that you refer SIV applicants only to fund managers with robust risk and governance frameworks.
The BIIP is a world class program, competing with other investment visa programs around the world to attract highly sought after investment capital. This reminder from OMARA and ASIC seeks to help to protect investors and enhance the integrity of the BIIP and assist visa applicants to obtain better quality investment advice that will lead to better investment outcomes.
How we can help
SW Wealth holds an authorised AFSL registration with ASIC and can assist with investment opportunities and advice. We can be found on the Financial Advisors Register, published by ASIC, here on the MoneySmart website. SW is an Australian owned accounting and advisory firm with an 85+ year history and provides a full range of wealth management and business advisory services, tax, assurance and corporate finance.
Financial Planning and Debt Advisory services are provided by Authorised Representatives of ShineWing Australia Wealth Pty Ltd AFSL/ACL 236556 Registered Migration Agent MARN 1790838Contacts
Over your lifetime you will likely build up a range of assets and wealth. Upon your death, these will need to be distributed in accordance with your through an estate plan.
Estate planning is not just about having a Will, it’s about ensuring that the assets you control are transferred to your intended beneficiaries, in a tax effective manner.
Your Will only looks after assets in your personal name. Your estate plan considers assets that are in entities controlled by you, such as through companies and trusts and importantly, your superannuation.
As accountants and business advisors, we are in a unique position to understand where all your assets are held and who ultimately controls those entities. It is also important to understand how debts and liabilities are to be dealt with as some debts may be paid off, while others may transfer to your beneficiaries.
For businesses owners’, part of your estate planning should ensure that you have a Buy/Sell Agreement in place with the other shareholders in the business and Buy/Sell insurance. This is important because some beneficiaries will not want to be involved in the business and wish to cash out of the investment as soon as practicable. Without this in place, the business may need to be sold to pay the estate.
Additionally, surviving shareholders will have an increased percentage shareholding and a Buy/Sell Agreement will ensure an unplanned shareholder will not be involved in the running of the business.
A practical and beneficial estate plan is a collaboration between you, your accountant, and your solicitor.
SW is co-hosting a three-part webinar series on Estate Planning and Power of Attorneys with Burke & Associates Lawyers. Join us to learn more about how estate planning can assist you.
Contacts
Heather Dyke
Keegan O’Rourke
Following the Disaster Payment Support announced by the NSW Government, the Federal Government and NSW Government have recently announced a further combined COVID-19 Support Package for businesses and individuals impacted by the current COVID-19 lockdown. This update will primarily focus on the support available to small and medium businesses to date.
Updated on 30 July 2021
COVID-19 business grant (refer to detailed criteria below)
Micro business grant (refer to detailed criteria below)
JobSaver (refer to detailed criteria below)
Other Measures
Applications open from 19 July 2021 to 13 September 2021
Basic criteria | Alternative circumstances | Other requirements (evidence in support of eligibility) |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
NSW COVID-19 micro-business grant
Applications open from 26 July 2021 to 18 October 2021
Basic criteria | Alternative circumstances | Other requirements (evidence in support of eligiblity) |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Applications open from 26 July 2021 to 18 October 2021
Basic criteria | Alternative circumstances | Other requirements (evidence in support of eligibility) |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
How we can help
Many businesses have found the eligibility criteria difficult to navigate, particularly for newer businesses without 2019 records.
Our experts can guide you through the process and help you gather accepted relevant documentation to ensure your business gains the maximum benefits from these support measures.
Tony Principe
Jae Debrincat
Dilushi Wijesinghe
[1] ‘Weekly payroll’ can be determined by referring to Item W1 in the most recent Business Activity Statement (‘BAS’) provided to the Australian Taxation Office prior to 28 June 2021 for the 2020-21 financial year.
[2] For businesses grouped by Revenue NSW, ‘total annual Australian wages’ should be calculated using the rules set out by Revenue NSW. Businesses not grouped should apply the ownership grouping provisions under the Payroll Tax Act 2007.[1] ‘Weekly payroll’ can be determined by referring to Item W1 in the most recent Business Activity Statement (‘BAS’) provided to the Australian Taxation Office prior to 28 June 2021 for the 2020-21 financial year.
[3] The Australian Taxation Office income assessment concept of ‘aggregated annual turnover’ will be applied.
[4] The Australian Taxation Office Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’) concept of ‘decline in turnover’ will be applied.
[7] If the associated person has more than one non-employing business, payments can only be claimed for one business.
[8] https://www.service.nsw.gov.au/jobsaver-payment-guidelines#attachment-b-ineligible-businesses